| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This is the initial refactoring to improve how we deal with the storage.
It does a couple of things:
* Rename Sink::Storage to Sink::Storage::DataStore to free up the
Sink::Storage namespace
* Introduce a Sink::ResourceContext to have a single object that can be
passed around containing everything that is necessary to operate on a
resource. This is a lot better than the multiple separate parameters
that we used to pass around all over the place, while still allowing
for dependency injection for tests.
* Tie storage access together using the new EntityStore that directly
works with ApplicationDomainTypes. This gives us a central place where
main storage, indexes and buffer adaptors are tied together, which
will also give us a place to implement external indexes, such as a
fulltextindex using xapian.
* Use ApplicationDomainTypes as the default way to pass around entities.
Instead of using various ways to pass around entities (buffers,
buffer adaptors, ApplicationDomainTypes), only use a single way.
The old approach was confusing, and was only done as:
* optimization; really shouldn't be necessary and otherwise I'm sure
we can find better ways to optimize ApplicationDomainType itself.
* a way to account for entities that have multiple buffers, a concept
that I no longer deem relevant.
While this commit does the bulk of the work to get there, the following
commits will refactor more stuff to get things back to normal.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
...because creating it will potentially start transactions on the
database we're about to remove.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The org.kde prefix is useless and possibly misleading.
Simply prefixing with sink is more unique and shorter.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
changereplay and synchronization.
This cleans up the API and avoids the excessive passing around of
transactions. It also provides more flexibility in eventually using
different synchronization strategies for different resources.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
(except for documentation).
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
During removal we no longer have access to the entity,
while that could be fixed by keeping a copy of the entity in the
removed entity, we can also just use the full path.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
implementations
|
| |
|
|
| |
So we create the store in one place.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
The sync and changereplay can not run at the same time, or would have
to share the transaction otherwise.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Not necessarily the smartest algorithms, but at least they work and
are generally applicable.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|
|
Respectively a first prototype thereof.
|
