| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
| |
To get rid of weird problems of lists converting to qmllistmodels.
I'm relatively sure some crashes I've seen were related to this.
|
| |
|
|
| |
We don't currently filter incoming items properly.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Summary:
- Add a test view for the log view
- Allow passing the `entities` part of Sink messages
- That allowed getting information about which mail could not be sent in sink transmission errors
Reviewers: cmollekopf
Reviewed By: cmollekopf
Differential Revision: https://phabricator.kde.org/D10861
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
This fixes marking partially unread threads as read.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
The extension itself is not really usable yet, but serves as a showcase.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
order
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Kube.View is a sort of split-view that always only shows a fixed number
of splits (and doesn't support manual resizing).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
To do this we:
* Expose from the model wether or not the model is threaded
* Set the relevant properties from the model on the controller (so we
can switch between aggregate and non-aggregate versions)
* Keep the controller in the view it belongs to.
While this works it highlights a couple of issues:
* Controllers are view specific and should be kept within the view.
* The actions we execute in the controller are closely related to the
model. The model is essentially what the user sees, and therefore what
he operatees on.
* Sink should perhaps expose aggregates better. We have to pass around
the values from the model because the model dispatches between
aggregate and non-aggregate property depending on the threaded state.
Similary the controller operates on the thread or not depending on the
threaded state. Perhaps it would be more useful if sink actually
returned the aggregate somehow, with the regular properties. That way
the controller could use the regular properties from the entity it
gets (which would simply either be the aggregate or non-aggregate
depending on the executed query). If the aggregate already contains
all matched ids, then we would also not have to execute an additional
query to get the thread again, the modification would simply be
applied to all ids originally returned.
|
| |
|
